Self awareness
Writing an "Internal Board of Directors" Monologue
This task externalizes different parts of the self (e.g.; the critic; the visionary) by having them.
For the client who is paralyzed by a significant decision, the internal debate can feel like a chaotic, unwinnable argument. They report being pulled in multiple directions at once, unable to distinguish between genuine caution, self-sabotage, or legitimate ambition. This friction leads to analysis paralysis, preventing any meaningful choice or action.
This directive objectifies that internal conflict, allowing the competing arguments to be seen as separate perspectives rather than a singular, confused state. The process organizes the internal noise into a coherent set of viewpoints. The client walks away with a clear map of their own motivations, understanding the logic behind each voice at the table.
Writing an "Internal Board of Directors" Monologue
Choose a specific, unresolved decision you are currently facing. This decision will be the single topic of a meeting.
Identify the different voices within you that have an opinion on this decision. These are your “Internal Board of Directors.” Give each one a functional title, such as The Critic, The Planner, The Risk-Taker, The Caretaker, or The Skeptic. List at least three distinct members.
Imagine these figures seated around a conference table. Write a script of their meeting. Give each board member a turn to speak. Write down exactly what each one would say, in their own distinct voice and style. Let them argue, agree, interrupt, or build on each other’s points. Do not try to steer the conversation toward a particular outcome. Your task is to record the debate as it happens.
Continue writing until each member has presented their case. Do not write a final resolution or conclusion to the meeting. Bring the written script with you.
Generated with Rapport7 — rapport7.com